| Read Time: < 1 minute | Criminal Justice

The Florida Supreme Court recently held that some criminal trials may be partially closed to the public, but the justices were split on their reasoning for this decision. Press and general public access to criminal proceedings help to ensure that defendants are granted fair trials. However, the court has held that in certain portions of trials involving sex crimes that judges can order a courtroom’s doors closed to outsiders.

In the case before the court, a man charged with lewd and lascivious acts against a minor had a portion of his trial closed to the public when the alleged victim of his acts was testifying. The defendant objected to the partial closure, but the court upheld a Florida law which allows alleged sex crime victims to request closure during his or her personal testimony.

Four justices insisted that Florida’s law meets United States Supreme Court criteria for public exclusion in every sex crimes case, especially because select family members, media, court reporters and victim advocates may remain present under state law.

However, other justices questioned whether or not the state law truly adheres to the Supreme Court’s criteria unless inquiries are made into reasonable alternatives in each case. Given how critical transparency is to the just functioning of the criminal legal system, this concern is not unfounded. The Supreme Court requires that any closure must not be broader than is absolutely necessary to protect a victims’ overriding interest which would be likely prejudiced if the testimony was subject to an open hearing.

It seems for now that Florida sex crime defendants will likely be subject to closure during victim testimony. This ruling makes it all the more critical that defendants are given a transparent and fair process at every other point during their trials.

Author Photo

Andrew Moses

Andrew has been practicing criminal law his entire career. After graduating from law school he began working as an Assistant State Attorney prosecuting cases in Orange and Osceola Counties. During his time as an Assistant State Attorney, Andrew handled all types of cases ranging from misdemeanors to such serious felonies as drug trafficking and armed robbery. His experience as a prosecutor helped him gain perspective of the criminal justice system and how the government established its cases.

Rate this Post

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars